![]() Can users visually distinguish your links through color and shape? A change in color can help give your link contrast. Does your link use the same color as your text? If it does, this can make it hard for users to find your links. If you feel like you have to use the words “here” to get users to see your link, there’s a problem with how your link looks. Using the word “here” to make your links noticeable is unnecessary because that’s what the distinct styling of a link should already do. When each link is labeled, they’re a lot easier for the user to distinguish What you should do instead is label your links with something that describes what the user is clicking so that it makes different links easier to distinguish. This forces them to have to use recall over simple recognition. If they want to refer back to a particular source, they have to remember which “here” link it belongs to. The user has to open each of them to see how they’re different. ![]() the user is going to have trouble differentiating between each link. Not only that, but If you have multiple links that say “here”, “here” and “here”. When your link doesn’t just say “here”, users can skip the verbose text and go right to the link If there’s a lot of text, this could slow users down a lot. This impedes users from taking the quick and short route of clicking the link directly because they have to read the surrounding text first. This means that users have to read the text all around the link to understand the context of the link. You may have text around the link that explains what they’re clicking, but when users read the link itself they won’t have a clue. The problem with using “here” in a link is that it conceals what the user is clicking. Some links don’t use the word “click”, but instead they use the word “here”. It keeps users engaged with the content and focused on using the interface, not their mouse. But a task-related verb makes users think of their task. “Click” makes users think of their mouse. There’s always a better and more relevant verb to use than “click”. Instead of using the word “click”, look for a different verb you can use that relates to the user’s task. “view” relates to the users task, while “click” puts the focus on mouse mechanics Not to mention, you can also make them feel dumb by suggesting that they don’t know what a link is or how to use a mouse. Instead of focusing on the interface and its content, “click here” diverts their attention to the user and their mouse. Doing so diminishes their experience of your interface because it momentarily takes their focus away from it. It’s unnecessary to call attention to the mechanics when clicking a link. Users know what a link is and how to use a mouse. ![]() Using the word “click” on your links takes the user’s attention away from your interface and on to their mouse. “Click” Puts Too Much Focus on Mouse Mechanics Before you give in to the temptation, you should know that using these words on a link can affect how users experience your interface. Increasing stakeholder knowledge of the intricacies of the FOIA process.Īgency FOIA professionals, agency FOIA leadership, FOIA technology developers, and members of the public are encouraged to review this white paper and the FOIA Reference Model and to use these tools to improve FOIA processes and technologies that may increase efficiency for FOIA programs.įor additional information about the CFO Council’s work, visit the Council’s page on you ever wanted your users to click your links, but didn’t know how to get them to act? When some designers run into this problem they’re tempted to use the words “click here” on their links.Serving as a resource to facilitate assessment of FOIA programs to identify gaps or opportunities for improved efficiency, review standard operating procedures, and define staff roles within stages of the FOIA process and,.Helping agencies to articulate their needs and helping vendors understand agencies’ needs when developing FOIA technologies.The FOIA Reference Model Working Group white paper outlines the possible uses for the FOIA Reference Model, which include: The FOIA Reference Model itself is publicly available on MITRE’s website. The Technology Committee’s FOIA Reference Model Working Group reviewed the model for consistency with the FOIA statute, agency regulations, Office of Information Policy guidance, Office of Government Information Services findings, and recommendations from the FOIA Advisory Committee. The FOIA Reference Model, created by the MITRE Corporation (MITRE), provides a detailed summary and mapping of common FOIA functions across agencies. The white paper highlights work done to create a Reference Model of the FOIA process and describes possible uses for the model. A white paper issued by the Chief FOIA Officer (CFO) Council Technology Committee’s FOIA Reference Model Working Group has been posted to.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |